Structuring the water quality policy problem: Using Q methodology to explore discourses in the Brantas River basin

Recognizing the interrelatedness of water use and conceptual value IWRM, progressive resource management systems are moving beyond hierarchical arrangements toward more integrated networks. Increasing calls for participation recognize broadened perspectives that provide both technical expertise as well social, cultural, administrative knowledge. Moreover, call evidence-based policy '00s has been tempered by recognition political nature data science. As such, decision-makers striving to coproduce employ shared knowledge must grapple with integrating inputs from diverse participant groups characterize problems identify effective feasible solutions. Participatory mandates, coordination bodies, collaborative networks have emerged facilitate such integration, their cooperation alignment relies upon some degree purpose, rather than command control. But guidance is limited respect how accomplish integrative aims, including support discussions across sectors silos practice in order foster better understanding regarding a network collectively aims address. Motivated observations within discourse on quality Brantas River basin Indonesia, this research explores alternative concepts problem structures river health via Q methodology. methodology, an approach uses factor analysis explore human subjectivity, applied conceptualizations “water problem” Brantas. The results show different emerge concept itself, characterization current condition Surprisingly, these variant do not follow oft-cited government-business-civil society divisions. emergent demonstrate which aspects consistent contested, suggesting several starting points early collaboration areas require further facilitated deliberation. also offer participants greater appreciation various definitions use, organizations, when discussing quality.